in high school a friend of mine once let me borrow a video tape of japanese tv and game shows. specifically i remember watching episodes of ‘takeshi jou’ (or
‘takeshi’s castle’, which is now used as footage for the show mxc in america). for those who don’t know, the show begins with about 100 contestants that gradually become eliminated through physically demanding obstacles as they try to reach and defeat takeshi in his castle. although untranslated, i was immediately fascinated with:
1. the shows strange concept
2. the complete disregard for human safety (at least by american standards).
3. the boundless energy, confidence and happy-go-lucky attitude of the contestants despite the bone-breaking obstacles they faced and lawsuit-riddled plunges they took.
even though the show aired in the late 80’s, i cannot say that i was not hoping for some the same caliber of tv shows when i came to japan in 2005. since being here i have seen a few shows that were somewhat interesting, but nothing especially noteworthy….until last night.
i don’t really know where to begin. for one, i don’t actually know the name of the show. what simply caught my attention at first was the fact that there were four japanese men and one woman wearing togas and fake beards…well the woman wasn’t wearing a beard…but had she actually worn one i don’t think he show could have gotten any more ludicrous.
my best guess is that they were imitating roman/greek gods talking about humans. each person had a ‘belief/rule/hypothesis’ that they thought about humans. they then staged intricate yet highly unscientific experiments to determine if the hypothesis was 'true'. if it held true for a majority of the people, a woman dressed as an angel would take a large quill pen and would scribe the rule in a gigantic book. if not, then the belief suggested would simply be dismissed.
for example, the first ‘rule’ i watched them test was:
-“women with body odor have bad luck”to try to prove this theory they took 20 women to a parking lot and had them choose between button ‘a’ or button ‘b’. if they pressed button ‘b’, it was good luck, because, hey, nothing happened. if they pressed button ‘a’ however, it was considered bad luck because they immediately got sprayed with water from a fire hose and knocked back onto an air mattress.
in the end, eight women were deemed unlucky by the fire hose god and were lined up in front of a professional i don’t know what its called…odor-ologist?...to have their armpits clinically sniffed and determined if the women had body odor or not. out of the eight, five women were designated odorless, while three were deemed odiferous with additional embarrassing qualifiers such as ‘smells strongly like soil’ and ‘smells like mildew.’ since only 3/8 women had body odor, clearly, the rule was not entered into the book.
other rules offered up and tested were,
- ‘men who use the word ‘positive thinking’ as part of their personal motto are not interesting or funny’ (not entered into the book, as 8/10 men who put ‘positive thinking’ as their motto on a survey were found to be haha funny and/or interesting)
- ‘hairy men with big voices will not become upset when their girlfriends tell them they are unexpectedly pregnant.’ (entered in the book. 4/8 men did not react negatively when their girlfriends lied to them and said they were pregnant. i can’t imagine the same holds true when the girlfriends had to admit they were lying)
- ‘women who wear the same pair of glasses over several years will become possessed when inside a haunted house’ (not entered in the book, only 3/10 women taken to a place that was said to be haunted claimed to have any uncontrollable conditions).
as bizarre as the experiments themselves sound, the funniest part of the show were discussions the hosts had when they presented their beliefs. there was not a trace of irony or sarcasm when they were explaining why they believed the things they did, or in the responses from the other hosts. no wry smile to indicate some sort of joke. had my friend not been translating, i would have thought that they were having a heavy philosophical discussion; contemplating the human condition, the poetics, or existentialism. who knows though… perhaps, through their absurdist acumen, they were accomplishing something with a similar effect.